These paper and pencil tests give an indication on how different brands of pencil behave on various types of paper that are currently available to the artist.
PLEASE NOTE: These are NOT scientific tests on the papers listed and the list is not comprehensive. The intention is simply to work some example shapes and lines onto a variety of papers, using 3 brands of pencils, so that any differences between the paper handling might show up,
The pencils used were from Faber Castell (Polychromos - an oil based pencil): Derwent (Coloursoft - a wax based pencil); and finally Caran d'Ache (Pablo - an oil based pencil). The same colours and patterns were used for each paper.
Most papers have a similar feel, and take coloured pencil in a similar way. The differences will be in the surface, absorbency and the ability to erase colour.
I have chosen cartridge papers, Hot Pressed watercolour ranges, pastel papers that have a smooth surface and some designed for printmaking.
The paper and pencil test cover 15 papers, using the three non-soluble brands of coloured pencil, as outlined above,
The layout of the test paper was somewhat arbitrary, but having started with the three tests shown here, I have stayed with them for consistency .
The paper was pre-printed with the standard layout and the coloured pencils selected were used and reserved so that each paper received the same pencils and colours.
The paper and pencil tests were carried out one test at a time on all 15 original papers so that the colour was laid down in a similar way and hopefully at similar pressures.
I simply laid down a series of blocks of colour.
Faber Castell Polychromos (an oil based medium hard pencil) was used for this.
The first block is showing a single even layer of pigment from the pencil, the second, two layers, etc.
One additional test was included here, a light wash of a citrus based solvent (Zest-It) was applied to a duplicate block of 6 layers making a seventh sample. This showed how the paper accepted a damp layer of solvent liquid to smooth the colour. It also revealed if the solvent caused any bleeding of colour on the paper.
I produced a set of four overlapping blocks of colour going from a light yellow through to a green and a strong line of red was applied over the top. Derwent Coloursoft was used here - a soft wax based pencil (similar to Prismacolor). The line was included to check how the paper took a sharply defined line.
The further check in test 2 was to see how the colour erased from the paper surface. I expected the softer wax pencils to be a problem here and, true to form, the wax did smear badly on some papers. The little power eraser was a Jakar model costing less than £5, but this is normally effective with oil based pencils on a Hot Pressed watercolour paper.
Test 3 used a collection of oil based pencils (Caran d’Ache Pablo) in overlapping blocks. The colour was worked in a clockwise direction from the red on the left, through white, pale blue, brown, yellow, purple, brown and finally white. I was looking at the way the dark colours were accepted over light ones and vice versa.
The same erasing test was set to reveal if the oil based pencils erased better - and in most cases they did.
So let’s move on to the paper and pencil tests.
Results of paper and pencil tests
This card has a smooth surface and was sold for craft use. It is about 300gsm and plain white in colour.
Test 1 with Polychromos showed the colour built up well in the layeringThe Zest-It solvent worked well in smoothing the colour
Test 2, the blocks of colour show the slight grain of the card with the Coloursoft wax pencils - only one quite strong layer was applied. The red line over the blocks was clean and sharp showing good definition for detail. The erasing test showed some smearing of the soft colour, but acceptable compared to some other samples
Test 3 effective layering and coverage. The white does not show up well on the high white surface of the card and I have shown the edges with a dotted lineErasing was about the same as for the Wax pencils… good but some smearing
Conclusion - Surprisingly good for a cheap surface. This test provides the marker by which the other tests are considered.
Results of paper and pencil tests
This card is light cream coloured and with a relatively smooth surface.
Test 1 with Polychromos showed the colour built up well in the layering. Some Grain is apparent The Zest-It solvent worked very well in smoothing the colour
Test 2 , the blocks of colour show up the grain of the card with the Coloursoft wax pencils - only one quite strong layer was applied. The red line over the blocks is quite defined with clean edges. The erasing test showed smearing of the soft colour which would not be acceptable
Test 3 showed effective layering and coverage. The white has been defined with a dotted line. The colour was reasonably well held by the surface.Erasing was better than the wax sample and acceptable
Conclusion - Reasonable results for an inexpensive paper with a good weight.
Results of paper and pencil tests
This is a fine surfaced watercolour paper in a light creamy colour. The two sides are virtually the same but the facing side on the pad is the smoothest. The test was carried out on this side.
Test 1 with Polychromos showed the colour built up well in the layering Grain is not apparent (even when worked on the reverse side)The Zest-It solvent worked very well in smoothing the colour
Test 2 the blocks of colour show up the different colours strongly with the Coloursoft wax pencils . The two yellows are quite markedly different in this sample. The red line over the blocks is accurate and strong though not as sharp as in some papers. The erasing test showed some smearing of the soft colour, but acceptable compared to some other samples
Test 3 effective layering and coverage. The white shows up well on the darker surface of some of the colours, and the colour was well held by the surface. Some of the colours smeared when a further darker colour was laid on top
Erasing was better than the wax sample and acceptable
Conclusion - As good a result as expected. This paper has been one of my choices for nearly 10 years.
Results of paper and pencil tests
This card has a matt smooth surface with a slight grain. Typical of cartridge paper. This is a student quality paper.
Test 1 with Polychromos showed the colour built up well in the layeringThe grain is quite apparentThe Zest-It solvent worked well in smoothing the colour
Test 2 the blocks of colour show up the grain of the card with the Coloursoft wax pencils. The red line over the blocks is slightly fuzzy but covered the under colour well. The erasing test showed some smearing of the soft colour, but acceptable compared to some other samples
Test 3 effective layering and coverage. The white does not show up well on the white surface of the card and I have shown the edges with a dotted lineErasing was better than the wax sample and quite acceptable
Conclusion - Good for a student quality white cartridge pape
Results of paper and pencil tests
This paper has been a good stand by for wet processes, but proved in these tests not as good as some for dry wax type work. In 2016 there were reports that the quality of this paper had seriously declined. Tests here were on old stock of the paper.
Test 1 with Polychromos showed the colour built up well in the layering. Grain is hardly apparent on the smooth paper The Zest-It solvent worked very well in smoothing the colour
Test 2 the blocks of colour show up well with the Coloursoft wax pencils - only one quite strong layer was applied. The red line over the blocks is clean and strong. The erasing test shows too much smearing of the soft colour, one of the poorest tested
Test 3 effective layering and coverage. The white and yellow show up well on the darker colours Erasing was better than the wax sample and just acceptable
Conclusion - This has been the ‘go to’ paper for some time, but the tests show that some of the other papers give superior overall performance. In view of quality control complaints I suggest potential users look elsewhere for an alternative paper.
Results of paper and pencil tests
A quality hot pressed watercolour paper with a smooth creamy coloured surface
Test 1 with Polychromos showed the colour built up well in the layering. Virtually no grain is apparentThe solvent makes a small difference and would probably be best used to bed down underlayers in a painting
Test 2 the blocks of colour show up well on the paper with the Coloursoft wax pencils. The red line over the blocks is well defined and has crisp edges The erasing test showed some smearing of the soft colour, but acceptable compared to some other samples
Test 3 effective layering and coverage. The colour was well held by the surface. The white over red shows the burnishing effect and the light blue over white shows how the white works as a resistErasing was better than the wax sample and very acceptable
Conclusion - A very good paper for wax and oil based pencils. More expensive than Fabriano Classico but probably worth it.
Results of paper and pencil tests
This card has one grained and one smoother surface with less grain. The Lana papers come in a wide range of colours. The test was carried out on the smooth side
Test 1 with Polychromos showed the colour built up well in the layeringGrain is apparent even on the smooth sideThe Zest-It solvent worked very well in smoothing the colour
Test 2 the blocks of colour show up the grain of the card with the Coloursoft wax pencils - only one quite strong layer was applied. The red line over the blocks is quite rough. The erasing test showed some smearing of the soft colour, but acceptable compared to some other samples
Test 3 effective layering and coverage. The white shows up well on the darker surface of the card, and the colour was well held by the surface.Erasing was better than the wax sample and acceptable
Conclusion - Not as good a result as expected. The paper colours may give some users wider options for backgrounds, but not really suitable for coloured pencil
Results of paper and pencil tests
This is not really a coloured pencil paper, but it was included to see how it compared. The pads are supplied with an assortment of colours so there is a choice available. Could be good for backgrounds.
Test 1 with Polychromos showed the colour built up well in the layering. Slight mechanical grain is apparent from the lay down of the cork surface but smoothed by the solvent.
Test 2 the blocks of colour show very strong take up of colour with the Coloursoft wax pencils - only one quite strong layer was applied. The red line over the blocks is reasonably defined The erasing test showed some smearing of the soft colour, but acceptable compared to some other samples.
Test 3 effective layering and coverage. The colour was well held by the surface, and later layers are still clearly seen. Erasing was better than the wax sample and acceptable.
Conclusion - Not an obvious choice for wax pencils, but the paper acquitted itself well. I would consider it as an option if I had a picture to complete with a dark background.
Results of paper and pencil tests
A fairly light weight paper with a smooth surface
Test 1 with Polychromos showed the colour built up well in the layeringA little grain is apparent but smoothed by the solvent check
Test 2 the blocks of colour show up the grain of the card with the Coloursoft wax pencils. The red line over the blocks is well defined The erasing test showed some smearing of the soft colour, not as good some other samples
Test 3 effective layering and coverage. The colour was well held by the surface. And further layers are clearly seen. Erasing was better than the wax sample and acceptable
Conclusion - A good lighter weight paper with a smooth surface and good take up of colour
Results of paper and pencil tests
A reliable print making paper from the USA. Used to be known as Rising Stonehenge until the Rising Mill Closed. Now made to the original formula and marketed by Legion Paper
Test 1 with Polychromos showed the colour built up well in the layeringSlight Grain is apparent but smoothed by the solvent check
Test 2 the blocks of colour show up little of the grain of the card with the Coloursoft wax pencils . The red line over the blocks is well defined with crisp edges The erasing test showed a lot of smearing of the soft colour, not acceptable and poor compared to some other paper samples.Erasing is not really an option here
Test 3 effective layering and coverage. The colour was well held by the surface. Further layers are clearly seen both with light over dark and the reverseErasing was better than the wax sample and acceptable
Conclusion - A good paper which has been the workhorse of CP in the USA for many years.It is available in the UK and Europe, but I think there are other papers equally good and more easily found in the UK
Results of paper and pencil tests
This card has a matt smooth surface with no obvious grain. It has a strong orange brown colour and is only sold in this shade.
Test 1 with Polychromos showed the colour built up well in the layeringVery little grain is apparentThe Zest-It solvent worked well in smoothing the colour, though the colour is sample 6 is already quite smooth
Test 2 the blocks of colour show up the slight grain of the card with the Coloursoft wax pencils . The red line over the blocks is clean edged and covered the under layers well. The erasing test showed some smearing of the soft colour, but acceptable compared to some other samples
Test 3 effective layering and coverage. The white shows up well on the darker surface of the card, and the colour was well held by the surfaceErasing was better than the wax sample and very acceptable ( almost a clean erase)
Conclusion - Very good result though the paper colour may put some people off
Results of paper and pencil tests
A light weight paper sold in pad form with a pronounced grain
Test 1 with Polychromos showed the colour built up well in the layering. Grain is apparent but smoothed by the solvent.
Test 2 the blocks of colour show up the grain of the card with the Coloursoft wax pencils - only one quite strong layer was applied. The red line over the blocks is reasonably defined The erasing test showed some smearing of the soft colour, but acceptable compared to some other samples
Test 3 effective layering and coverage. The colour was well held by the surface.Erasing was better than the wax sample and acceptable
Conclusion - A new paper to me in the UK. I found it better than expected from the initial sight of a well grained lightweight paper. Results proved acceptable
Results of paper and pencil tests
A heavyweight ‘top of the range’ watercolour paper. I tested it as a Hot Pressed paper assuming it would have a smooth surface. The sample described as HP is more like a cold pressed paper with a pronounced grain to the surface
Test 1 with Polychromos showed the colour built up well in the layeringGrain is apparent but smoothed by the solvent check
Test 2 the blocks of colour show up the strong grain of the paper with the Coloursoft wax pencils. The red line over the blocks is reasonably defined The erasing test showed a lot of smearing of the soft colour, poor compared to some other samples
Test 3 effective layering and coverage. The colour was well held by the surface.Erasing was better than the wax sample and acceptable
Conclusion - A new paper to me in the UK. This is an expensive watercolour paper and I would not pay the price for using it with wax or oil based coloured pencils. I will test it with Watercolour pencils - I would expect the results to be better
Results of paper and pencil tests
A new paper released in the summer of 2017 to the UK market. This paper is made by Saunders Waterford for R.K.Burt and is an extra smooth, white, Hot pressed paper.
Test 1 with Polychromos shows the colour builds up well even though the surface is very smooth. Some effort will be required to get strong colour with just wax pencils
Test 2 with blocks of colour from Coloursoft. Good coverage on the smooth paper with the softer pencils. excellent definition on the edges as one would expect and excellent erasing with virtually no smearing of the wax.
Test 3 once again very good coverage with the medium hardness Pablos . even the white shows well. Erasing of the oil based pencil is superb with virtually no colour left.
Conclusion - although the paper is very smooth, the colour holding is excellent and it will work particularly well with the softer wax based pencils. I was surprised how well the oil based pablo pencils performed. This is a good replacement for the Fabriano Classsico 5 which R. K. Burt imported.
Results of paper and pencil tests
A specialist surface made with fine particles permanently bonded to heavyweight card. There is a white version available and several colours. I selected the gold surface.
Across all three tests the surface performed very well with the exception of the erasing of the soft wax coloursoft pencil line which is not surprising in view of the absorbent nature of the surface. Using solvent on the Polychromos achieved nothing.
With good colour holding, this smooth pastel card makes a good case for coloured pencil use. It could have difficulty with very fine detail in view of the granular nature of the working surface, but for strength of colour it has been the best surface so far on test.
Conclusion - An expensive card surface in a range of colours. It works exceptionally well within its capacity. Not ideal for fine detail. Solvents do not seem to work particularly well, but then I don’t know why you would need to use them.